How to Get Rid of Low-Quality Sources in the Literature List

Quality sources are just as important as the motivation and support of a supervisor. The success of the research depends on their quality.

When compiling a coursework bibliography, we advise you to concentrate on articles. Such publications undergo a peer review process - this reduces the risk of publishing a meaningless set of words. But the system isn't perfect, and publishers don't have a clear conscience. To get a really high-quality list of literature and work in general, it is better to contact https://essaypay.com/coursework-help/ they helped me with my coursework and they can help you. After all, if you yourself will search, then in the process of searching you will meet rubbish articles, that's for sure. We'll show you how to calculate them.

It is impossible to find meaning in the heavy and intricate style of the author. If it seems that emptiness is hiding behind a heap of buzzwords, then most likely it is. Paperwork is the weapon of choice for authors who inflate the list of publications. Not to be confused with articles on complex topics: from difficult, but good articles, insight periodically rolls. From literary idle talk, only a ringing feeling of emptiness arises in the head.

The article is too short. The other extreme is small, unpretentious articles. They consist of an introduction and a conclusion. At best, in the middle of the article, the author left an unfounded thesis. Such texts are written by first-year students for admission to the test.

The author refers only to himself. In the best case, the author winds up the citation index and wants to receive an award as a shock researcher. At worst, you have a pseudoscientist promoting a pseudoscientific concept.

The article describes something strange. You don't have to be a scientist to suspect a trick. Close the article if the author writes something like: “Most scientists do not recognize”, “It is generally accepted that this is the case, but in reality everything is different.” If you still want to push a controversial publication into the work, you should not build a central idea on its basis.

Value judgments. A scientist, like a journalist, must be impartial. If the author's "unfortunately" or "fortunately" are not supported by arguments, there is a high probability that you have a garbage article in front of you. There are exceptions: there are reasoning articles, but such texts should not be taken as absolute truth.

The title of the journal does not match the topic of the article. Garbage are not only articles, but also scientific journals. If a revolutionary historical study is published in the Agricultural Herald, this is a wake-up call.

The journal publishes too many articles. On the net, you can find pdf-issues of journals with several hundred articles on topics from medicine to space flights. The more publications, the weaker the quality control in the publishing house.

Information from garbage sources may be incorrect, outdated or superficial. If this could go unnoticed in the term paper, then in the case of a diploma, the risks increase significantly.